This is the web version of the WSJ’s daily economic newsletter. You can sign up for daily delivery here.
This is an abbreviated edition of Real Time Economics. Regular publication resumes Monday.
In this edition, inflation approaches the Fed’s 2% target, tax audits drop, Amazon.com helps the post office.
FED’S TARGET IN SIGHT
Inflation could soon be back at the Fed’s 2% target
. In February the Fed’s preferred price index rose 0.23% excluding food and energy, propelled by brisk health care inflation. While it’s only up 1.6% in the last 12 months, that’s largely because of very low monthly readings a year ago. In the last three months, prices have risen at a 2.8% annual rate. That suggests the 12-month rate could easily hit 2% in coming months as low year-ago readings drop out of the calculation. That won’t panic the Fed which has long expected such Continue reading "Real Time Economics: Inflation | Korea Trade Deal | IRS Audits"
Don’t panic, but the main engine of the U.S. economy might stall in February.
Consumer outlays account for more than two-thirds of total economic output
, and spending data—not least the Commerce Department
’s monthly report on sales at retail stores and restaurants
—are closely watched by forecasters and policy makers for clues on the trajectory of the overall economy.
[wsj-responsive-sandbox id = "0" ]
Retail spending rose more than expected in January
, despite a pullback in auto sales. But when the February retail-sales report comes out on March 15, there’s at least one reason to expect a weak reading: Tax-refund payments were delayed for millions of U.S. households claiming the earned-income tax credit or additional child tax credit.
“To the extent this large group of lower-income consumers don’t get their refunds until several weeks later than previously, it is likely to be felt by retailers and could Continue reading "Consumers May Have Cut Back in February. Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Worry"
has been watching the drama around the Internal Revenue Service
since 2013 with the perspective of someone who has seen it all before, because he has. Mr. Caplin, who will turn 100 years old in July, ran the U.S. tax agency from 1961 to 1964 before becoming a founding member of the Caplin & Drysdale law firm in Washington.
[wsj-responsive-image P="//si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-OG632_caplin_P_20160531181937.jpg" J="//si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-OG632_caplin_J_20160531181937.jpg" M="//si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-OG632_caplin_M_20160531181937.jpg" caption="Mortimer Caplin, 99, ran the Internal Revenue Service under President John F. Kennedy" credit="Richard Rubin/The Wall Street Journal" placement="Wrap" suppressEnlarge="false" ]
He spoke to Real Time Economics about the IRS and how tax law has changed over time. Here are excerpts from the conversation:
When and how did you find out that you were going to be nominated?
I was teaching at the University of Virginia. I was a law professor. And I had Bob Continue reading "Q&A: 99-Year-Old Former IRS Commissioner Mortimer Caplin on Life and Taxes"
What do the biggest U.S. companies actually pay in corporate taxes? Good luck figuring that out.
In 2012, profitable large corporations in the U.S. paid an average tax rate of 16.1% and about one-fifth paid no taxes at all, according to a new Government Accountability Office
“At a time when Republicans tell us that we don’t have enough money to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure or provide universal child care, maybe, just maybe we should stop allowing huge corporations to pay nothing in federal income taxes,” said Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders
, who asked for the study. “Corporate greed is destroying the fabric of America. It must come to an end.”
But calculated a different way, those same companies paid 17.3%, or 18.5%, or 19.5%, or 21.1%, or 22% or 23% or 26.3% in taxes. Where does that data Continue reading "U.S. Corporate Taxes May Be 16% or 40%—It’s All How You Do the Math"
IRS Commissioner John Koskinen packed his annual speech at the National Press Club on Thursday with facts and figures. Here are the most interesting.
- Even if you’re not a tax expert, software and shady tax preparers make it incredibly easy to fiddle with the numbers until you hit the sweet spot that shows the maximum refund.
- ANDREW HARRER/BLOOMBERG
Aggressive tax planning isn’t just for the rich.
A new study shows how low-income households frequently report the exact right amount of income to get the maximum refundable tax credit
from the Internal Revenue Service
. And they follow the tax law from year to year, adjusting their income to fit changes that Congress makes.
Consider, for example, a married self-employed couple with two children. They pay payroll taxes, but make too little money to owe income taxes. Instead, they’re eligible to get tax credits designed to encourage work and help them raise children.
In 2012, to get the maximum refund of about $5,070, they had to report about $16,200, which happens to be the point where Continue reading "How Some Americans Hit the Maximum Tax-Refund Sweet Spot"
- Republican U.S. presidential candidate Senator Ted Cruz waves in front of rival candidate businessman Donald Trump as they stand with fellow candidates Governor John Kasich, Governor Chirs Christie, Senator Marco Rubio and Dr. Ben Carson as they pose together before the start of the Fox Business Network Republican presidential candidates debate in North Charleston, South Carolina January 14, 2016.
- Chris Keane/Reuters
The Republican debate audience went to a shout-fest Thursday, and a tax symposium broke out.
Senators Marco Rubio
and Ted Cruz
engaged in a long back-and-forth on Mr. Cruz’s tax plan, arguing over whether it was the value-added tax that conservatives have been opposing for decades. It’s a fight Mr. Rubio previewed earlier in the week
in ways that made tax nerds blissful.
For everyone else, this can get a bit bewildering
. So here’s morning-after scorecard:
- Is it a VAT?
Mr. Rubio argued that Mr. Cruz’s 16% Business Continue reading "Rubio and Cruz Dueled Over the VAT Tax. And the Winner Was…"
- Self-employed taxpayers who got audited and came out unscathed reported less income in future years, an average of 35% lower three years after the audit, a new study says.
- J. DAVID AKE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Getting audited by the Internal Revenue Service
—and losing—is devastating. You have to pay more in taxes, and, perhaps scared of a repeat defeat, you’re likely to report much more income in future years.
Once bitten, twice shy.
But getting audited by the IRS and winning
the fight with the taxman is a completely different experience, according to a study released this week by the IRS’s National Taxpayer Advocate. Self-employed taxpayers who got audited and came out unscathed reported less income in future years, an average of 35% lower three years after the audit, the study says. Having learned where the edge is, they seem to skate closer to it.
Once bitten, twice sly.
“The audit process might
Continue reading "What Happens After You Beat the IRS in an Audit"
- In fiscal 2014, for example, the IRS audited 1.5% of tax returns with incomes between $200,000 and $400,000 and 12.1% of returns with incomes above $5 million. But the tippy-top is where the money is.
- J. DAVID AKE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Is $200,000 a high income? Yes. But maybe it shouldn’t be considered one by the IRS.
The Internal Revenue Service
spends too much time and effort auditing people who make $200,000 to $400,000 and too little going after the very wealthiest Americans, according to an inspector general’s report released late Thursday.
In response, the IRS is re-examining its decision to consider $200,000 a “high income” for auditing purposes and is looking at indexing that threshold to inflation. In an era of declining budgets, that move could let the tax agency concentrate the work of employees who specialize in auditing the complex returns of the superwealthy.
The IRS audits fewer
Continue reading "It’s Time to Focus IRS Audits on the Superrich, Inspector General Says"
Tuesday night’s Republican debate
- One of the most compelling exchanges of the Republican debate in Milwaukee on Tuesday was the dispute over Sen. Marco Rubio’s tax plan.
- SCOTT OLSON/GETTY IMAGES
was about taxes, taxes and fewer taxes. Here are five highlights:
1. Marco Rubio vs. Rand Paul
One of the most compelling exchanges between candidates was the dispute over Mr. Rubio’s tax plan, which calls for an additional $2,500 child tax credit that would be refundable against income and payroll taxes.
Mr. Rubio’s child credit is the centerpiece of the so-called “reformicon” agenda, which de-emphasizes reductions in the top tax rate on wage income in favor of devoting tax breaks to assisting families. Indeed, his proposed top income tax rate of 35% is the highest in the Republican field
and is just 4.6 percentage points below today’s top rate. Mr. Rubio pitches the child tax credit as a pro-family Continue reading "The GOP Debate: Taxes, Taxes and Fewer Taxes"